What to do with faint galaxies
We’ve received a number of questions on Talk about what to do with faint galaxies, like this one:
Galaxies like this one are not stars or artifacts, they are just veeeery faint, so faint that even a telescope as powerful as Hubble is stretched to its capabilities to image them. When you do see such a faint galaxy, please just answer the questions as best you can. In this case, I’d call this one “smooth”.
Don’t worry about the pixellation. The Wide Field Camera 3 infrared pixels are larger than those of Hubble’s optical camera, but the resolution is still very high. So, even though you see pixels in the image of the galaxy above, it’s actually well resolved. It just happens to be smooth and featureless…
So, what about this one?
Can you see features despite the noise, or is it smooth? It’s your call. Remember, most of these galaxies haven’t been seen before by humans, so there’s no right or wrong answer. Just do your best!
- RT @alankerlin: .@CanberraDSN @PlanetaryKeri @SarcasticRover I made a "I did a science" t-shirt using @galaxyzoo http://t.co/SCCr2MhBNg 4 hours ago
- RT @NGC3314: Galaxy-dynamics guru Ron Buta on quality of @galaxyzoo Zoo2 sample of resonance-ring galaxies: "I could not have it done it be… 20 hours ago
- RT @NGC3314: More time with 6m BTA telescope for @galaxyzoo AGN followup! (Kind of flattered to receive Russian version of allocation list) 3 days ago
- RT @the_zooniverse: Amazing Galaxy of the Week – What the…? wp.me/p3RVQp-wp 3 days ago
- RT @NGC3314: Ahh. Web status for 6m Russian telescope БТА is detailed enough to show that colleague is now observing one of our targets: @g… 1 week ago