What to do with faint galaxies
We’ve received a number of questions on Talk about what to do with faint galaxies, like this one:
Galaxies like this one are not stars or artifacts, they are just veeeery faint, so faint that even a telescope as powerful as Hubble is stretched to its capabilities to image them. When you do see such a faint galaxy, please just answer the questions as best you can. In this case, I’d call this one “smooth”.
Don’t worry about the pixellation. The Wide Field Camera 3 infrared pixels are larger than those of Hubble’s optical camera, but the resolution is still very high. So, even though you see pixels in the image of the galaxy above, it’s actually well resolved. It just happens to be smooth and featureless…
So, what about this one?
Can you see features despite the noise, or is it smooth? It’s your call. Remember, most of these galaxies haven’t been seen before by humans, so there’s no right or wrong answer. Just do your best!
- Citizen Scientists Probe Early Galaxies: a @SkyandTelescope article about @vrooje's GZ paper on disk galaxy evolution skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news… 1 hour ago
- RT @the_zooniverse: We're experiencing a short technical hiccup - things should be back up in a few moments. 1 day ago
- RT @ZooTeach: BBC News - Information from volunteers crucial to research, say scientists buff.ly/1vav3rT Featuring @planethunters @p… 5 days ago
- Mark your diary for 11th July 2015 aka our 8th Birthday! RT @the_zooniverse: ZooCon 2015 –@Oxford wp.me/p3RVQp-sF 6 days ago
- Paper by Cheung+ (GZteam) using GZ:Hubble classifications to look for links bw bars and accreting black holes: arxiv.org/abs/1409.5434 1 week ago