Several weeks ago, we issued a challenge: re-create the Galaxy Zoo poster in a new way to tell the story of Galaxy Zoo yourself. When I posted this, I wasn’t sure if anyone would find it interesting, but as always, your creativity is amazing. The first submission is in, from Julia, and it is breathtaking. Behold:

Julia’s Galaxy Zoo poster remix (1.2 MB JPG)

I think you’ll agree that this is a big improvement over the text-heavy original, and I think it’s one of the most amazing science posters I’ve ever seen. Congratulations to Julia on an amazing piece of science/art! (Julia, if you’re reading, please say hello in the Comments section.) If anyone else is interested in remixing the poster, send me a message in the forum (I’m zookeeperJordan).

For the past few months on this blog, we’ve been talking about the science of Galaxy Zoo – what your millions of classifications have revealed to us about the way the universe works. Right now, as Steven and I described Friday and Monday, the members of the Galaxy Zoo team are writing papers announcing our science results, and offering feedback on each other’s papers.

But of course, Galaxy Zoo has become much more than just a science project. The site has become an Internet phenomenon, and for the next few posts, we’d like to focus on some other aspects of the Galaxy Zoo phenomenon. Today, we wanted to talk about the thing that makes everything else work – the site itself.

Without a good-looking and well-functioning website, we could have never invited all of you to participate in this project, and you could not have generated the excellent scientific dataset that you have generated. The site was designed by two professional web designers: Phil Murray and Dan Andreescu. Galaxy Zoo is now proudly listed as a featured project on Phil’s web site.

Phil designed the look and feel of the site, and Dan wrote the code that allowed the website to take your input and write it into a database of classifications. Dan left the project in late 2007, and Danny Locksmith has taken over the coding.

The best way to tell the story of Galaxy Zoo’s design is to let Phil and Danny tell the story themselves. So here is Phil, talking about how he designed the layout of Galaxy Zoo:

GZ1.0 Visual Design

I was asked by Chris Lintott to design the Galaxy Zoo logo and web site in March 2007, and I realised early on that this had the potential to be a hugely successful project — little did we know just how successful it would be! I was given a completely free rein to handle the visual design of both the logo and the web site.

The Galaxy Zoo Logo

I wanted to create a visually appealing logo that would work in several formats – web and print. It had to be flexible enough to work as a standalone logo or to be incorporated into an overall page design – as is the case with the web site. The graphic part of the logo is in fact based on a Hubble image of Supernova 1987A Rings, which seemed to fit very neatly into the text of ‘GALAXY ZOO’ to form an official logo. A variation was developed for both web and print use.

The Galaxy Zoo Web Site

It seemed obvious that part of the attraction of the GZ1.0 project to non-astronomers was the sheer beauty of the galaxy images, plus the fact that many of these images had never previously been seen by human eyes. So I wanted to maximise impact right up front on the Home Page of the site by using a large galaxy image as a main background to the page and to carry this theme through into the inner pages. I wanted all text to sit on a semi transparent screened background to give the impression of depth on the page.

Choosing a colour palette was relatively straightforward given the colours within the logo, hence the basic black, grey, orange and gold colour scheme. It was decided to go with a slightly shallower header graphic for inner pages with all top navigation shown horizontally and any secondary navigation to be contained in a left column (as is the case in the Analysis Page). I decided on a fixed width solution catering for a minimum screen resolution of 1024×768 pixels.

When it came to the buttons for the Galaxy Analysis page, I spent some time designing what I hoped would be generic buttons for the various options on offer (Spiral Galaxy – Anticlockwise, Clockwise and so on). The intention was to try to design buttons that would not influence the decision making of the Galaxy Zoo visitor but also that they would be intuitive to use. In fact it quickly became apparent that having designed the buttons to look like they were part of an ‘online  game’, was a feature which also helped with the appeal and overall usability of the site. The feedback and data received as part of GZ1.0 has given us some valuable information about how to present these and other buttons for GZ2.0.

As for building the site, I constructed all the pages as HTML templates, which were then integrated into the ASP.Net web programming environment by the excellent Dan Andreescu. Danny Locksmith has taken over the ASP.Net duties since late 2007.

I think you’ll agree that the site that Phil did a great job – he created a really beautiful site that was easy to navigate. Now here is Danny, talking about how he took over the coding from Dan:

Most of the ASP programming was decided on before I got involved. My task so far has been to try to understand how someone else thought it should work!

In effect this is how it works:

Your login to the site, your user preferences, etc. are all controlled by the .NET 2.0 framework. The site uses a template that provides the basic logic involved in recording your clicks and ensuring that the right person is credited with each classification. The persistant data is stored in a database.

When you load the Galaxy Analysis page, a galaxy is selected randomly and displayed on the page. Next to the galaxy’s image is a the Galaxy ID, which is a hotlink to an SDSS page where you can view details of the galaxy – its spectrum and a zoomable picture, etc. Watch for changes to this in GZ2!

Next to the galaxy image is a custom control which has the various buttons you can click to classify the galaxy. Since we learned about the anticlockwise bias, various theories have been put forward about to explain it – one of them is the design and layout of these buttons. Another problem here was that people tended to click the button several times, recording several results. This was worked around by only allowing one classification per galaxy. Yet another potential problem was that you could easily make an error, but you could not go back and fix it. Look for changes in GZ2!

Once you click a button, your classification, your user ID, the date and time, etc. are recorded in a database. The data that is stored was designed to answer specific questions, and the scientific papers which are to be published soon. With the advent of the bias testing phase, additional information was stored in the same database – the way the image displayed had been transformed.

In GZ2, the data collected will be more generic, and will create a very comprehensive catalog of galaxy information, almost certainly the biggest ever. To a great extent, the inner workings of the site are defined by the various scientists involved in the project. It is very much designed by the entire team, and as such my task is to ensure that the finished site meets all the goals of the team, and at the same time is pleasureable to navigate and to use.

You will be able to decide if I was successful when GZ 2 is launched!

I’ll add just two things to what Phil and Danny said:

1) The servers that run Galaxy Zoo are in the Physics and Astronomy building at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. (Here is the building in Google Maps – the Johns Hopkins lacrosse stadium is just to the north, and the building across the winding street is the Space Telescope Science Institute).

2) One of the things I find amazing about Galaxy Zoo is that no member of the team has ever met all the other members face-to-face. Chris has come closest – he has met everyone except Jan and Alainna, who do IT support for the servers at JHU. In addition, 8,549 km separates Anze in Berkeley, California from Chris, Kate, and Kevin in Oxford. The Galaxy Zoo team could not have existed without the Internet, and communication tools that allow us to work together productively on different continents.

As you may have noticed from the sparseness of recent posts, the Galaxy Zoo team have all been buckling down in an effort to get some work done. Progress on my Galaxy Zoo paper has been a little delayed by the need to do some work for another project I’m involved with: the GAMA survey. The first observations for this survey will start in a few weeks time, so I couldn’t really put off doing my bit to help make sure we target the right objects! All astronomers usually have several different projects on the go, some of which span years.  Juggling them all can get a little tricky.  Anyway, with my most urgent work out of the way, I’ve had another push on my Galaxy Zoo paper and today I sent a draft version around to the team members for them to have a look at.

Generally, although several people may contribute to a scientific paper, the main business of writing the text and putting together the figures is done by one person, the lead author. This person is usually the one who has done the most work producing the results that are described in the paper, and their name comes first in the author list. Once the paper is mostly complete, although still at an early stage, it is often sent around the coauthors for comments. It is helpful to get input from the coauthors at this stage to help refine the overall structure and content of the paper before too much effort has gone into checking the fine details, because these will get messed up again if the paper ends up being rearranged following the coauthors feedback.

We’ve recently had drafts set around the Galaxy Zoo team by Kevin and Chris, and today Kate also sent hers. These are all looking good, though some still need a little bit more analysis including. When the rest of the authors have given their feedback, the lead author tries to incorporate their suggestions into the paper. Sometimes this process might go through a couple of cycles before a final draft is produced. The final draft is then proof read by some of the coauthors, to check the spelling, grammar, style, and to generally improve the clarity of the text.

Finally, when all the authors are content, the paper is submitted to a journal for peer review, prior to being publishing. We’ll describe that stage in a bit more detail when we get there.

One of the things that constantly amazes me about astronomy is how much we can learn from so little. The only information we get from stars and galaxies is the light they give off. Whether this light comes in the form of visible light, infrared radiation, radio waves, x-rays, and so on – it’s still just light. We can’t go see these galaxies ourselves, even by robotic probes. We can’t bring samples back. We can’t even get a different view of the galaxy – we are stuck here on Earth, watching from one location. And if something in the sky changes – as it does constantly, sometimes dramatically – we can’t say “hey, I missed that. Do it again!”

Given these constraints, it is sometimes amazing to me that we learn anything at all. But we have learned so much about the sky – everything from our planet’s place in the Solar System to the origin of the universe!

Since all our knowledge of astronomy is gained by looking, it makes sense that we should look as hard as we can. That’s the premise of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which you’ve heard a lot about, since it’s the source of all the images you see on Galaxy Zoo. The Sloan used a 2.5-meter telescope in New Mexico, USA to look up at the sky every clear night for five years. Its goal: to use these observations to make a map of the universe.

The more we look at the sky, the more likely we are to see something interesting. That’s the guiding principle of astronomy, of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and now of Galaxy Zoo.

Many of you are now scanning through SDSS images, classifying galaxies by shape. This is a critically important thing to do, but computers find it difficult, so it takes people watching carefully. And, as we have all seen with the Voorwerp (described here once, twice, three times), the more you look, the more you see.

And starting in 2013, the new Large Synoptic Survey Telescope will watch the sky as never before, viewing the entire sky at a higher resolution than the SDSS – every four nights.

It’s an exciting time to be involved with astronomy, and we’re glad that Galaxy Zoo has been a part of that. Keep looking up!

A user on the forum asked me what I meant by the word ‘random’ in my previous blog post. A statistician could explain this more precisely, but I’ll give my understanding of it in an astronomy context.

A random process is one in which a variety of alternatives could occur, but beforehand we cannot know which alternative actually will occur. The alternatives need not be equally likely, and the probabilities of each alternative happening (the probability density function) may be known very well. If we repeat the process many times, the number of times each alternative occurs will be very close to the probabilities we might already know. But we don’t know which alternative will actually happen each time the process occurs.

A random system is one which arises as a result of random processes. Everything has some element of randomness in it, nothing is perfectly ordered, but some things have a lot more order to them than others. The chair you are probably sitting on while reading this is a highly ordered system. Even though the atoms in it are jiggling around randomly to some extent, their overall motions are generally very ordered. The random motions of the atoms are not very large compared with the order that was instilled in the chair when it’s materials were constructed, whether that was by metal cooling in a mould or wood slowly forming in a tree.

The motions of stars in a spiral galaxy disk have a lot of order to them, as they are mostly formed by relatively gentle physical processes that maintain information about the history of the system. The galaxy started rotating long ago, and the stars which formed in it are still rotating today. In an elliptical galaxy some process has happened, for example a merger of two galaxies, which disturbs that order. The random process at work is the multiple close interactions of pairs of stars. The motion of two stars after they have passed close by one another is very dependent on the exact values of their motion before the interaction. If each of those stars then interacts with other stars we quickly get to a state where we could never know the stars’ initial motions well enough to predict their motions at a later time. This is an example of a chaotic system, and it can even occur for three objects interacting through gravity, never mind the billions of stars in a typical galaxy. There are many alternative paths the stars could travel along, and beforehand we don’t know which paths the individual stars will take. Despite this, we can go part way to determining what the result will be overall, a big fuzzy ball. The stars in elliptical galaxies are not moving totally randomly, there are certain ranges of orbits that are more populated than they should be for a truly random system. This order is a ‘memory’ of the initial motions of the stars in the merging galaxies. However, most of the stars’ movements are dominated by random motions.

Galaxy Zoo features in this week’s Carnival of Space, a collection of all the best space blog writing from the past seven days. This week it’s in a 50s detective story format…and it’s definitely worth a look.