Archive | Site News RSS for this section

Hello From Palomar

I’m Robert, an astronomer at the California Institute of Technology working on thePalomar Transient Factory (PTF). I have arrived at the  Palomar Observatory in anticipation of my two night run on the 5.1 meter Hale Telescope. The plan is to take spectra of new PTF discoveries to find out what they are, and maybe follow-up on some of the more interesting sources we’ve already identified.

The dome of the Palomar 5.1m Hale Telescope

The dome of the Palomar 5.1m Hale Telescope

As you can see from the photo, the mountain was dusted with snow a couple days ago, but it was quite nice out at my arrival. Hopefully the wet stuff will help clear up our ash problem left over from this summer’s wild fires. More rain and/or snow may fall in the next few days, but I’m hoping the skies will clear up enough at night so that I can get some observing in.

Our survey telescope, which is just a short walk from the Hale Telescope, has gathered some new images over the last few nights. These likely contain a few new supernovae which you can help us identify. If all goes well, I will make spectroscopic observations the next two nights of the best candidates found. These data will reveal what the candidates are. There’s always the chance of discovering something new, which makes this all very exciting!

So happy hunting, and look for updates throughout my observing run.

Galaxy Zoo: Supernova is back

After a couple of trial runs in August and October, the hunt for supernovae is now back – and we need your help again! As before, we’re supporting the Palomar Transient Factory in their search for supernovae, and we have an upcoming observing run, this time at the Palomar 200in telescope.

We are hoping to keep the supernova hunt website up for good now – no more trials! – and so no danger of you being cut off in a few days time.

A few pieces of news from the supernova hunt.

The first is that we would have been back sooner, but Palomar, the observatory at which PTF operates, has suffered unusual atmospheric conditions following the forest fires in Southern California over the summer. A build-up of ash and dust in the atmosphere has meant the number of nights on which the observatory has been open has been greatly reduced, and so the supernova search has been offline for much of the Autumn. Even now, the conditions are still unstable, so please bear with us if the number of candidates is very small!

The second is that in the near future we will have a website containing feedback on the classifications that you’ve all been doing. We’re also in the process of writing a scientific paper on the trial runs from earlier in the year.

Finally, we are planning to add other supernova searches to the hunt – so watch this space for more data.

That’s all for now. Good luck with the supernova hunting, and don’t forget to post questions or comments over in the forum!

Want to work with the Galaxy Zoo team?

The Zoo team is expanding once again, and we’re advertising jobs in Oxford and Chicago.

The Oxford job would be suitable for a postdoc who wants to do science with the Zoo, and get involved in the technical side of things. The job advert is here.

The two Chicago positions are for education researchers, based at the Adler planetarium. The adverts for these two positions are here.

Hope to be working with you soon…

Chris

Galaxy Zoo: Mergers – A personal perspective

Now that the launch of Galaxy Zoo: Understanding Cosmic Mergers has been completed, I wanted to give a personal perspective on this project.

For me, this project started twenty years ago  when I was in graduate school.    In my dissertation work, I  modeling the tidal features of interacting galaxies.  I wrote a Fortran code for doing some of this modeling work.   You would set up a run, and then wait hours to see the result.   If it didn’t match, you had to wait hours for the next attempt.

a82

The worst part about the modeling process was getting the “final” result.   Even if you got a close match, you never knew if you had actually found the best match.  It was always possible that a completely different set of parameters was the real solution, and you had just made a mistake.    Even with good fits, you couldn’t tell if you really had arrived at the ‘right’ solution.

Our understanding of galaxy collisions has been limited by the lack of dynamical models.  For example, we know that some galaxy collisions have very high star formation rates.   We also know that almost all extreme star burst galaxies (Ultra-luminous infrared galaxies) have undergone some type of collision.   Why isn’t this sort of reaction the inevitable result of a merger?   It seemed like the answer was always out of reach – unless we can understand the dynamics of lots of collisions.

The java applet developed for Mergers by Anthony Holincheck is the direct descendent of the old Fortran code.  Now you can run the same kind of simulations I ran for my dissertation in fractions of a second.    When Anthony and I first resurrected this code, we immediately tried using a Genetic Algorithm help us converge on the final solution.   It didn’t work.   We couldn’t reliably teach the computers how to recognize a good match.   We could run a few hundred thousand simulations per day, but we never knew if we got the right results.

The idea of using volunteers to help us happened a few years ago.   It was crazy and impractical to imagine volunteers helping out with a project like this.   Even so, a group of us proposed to do.  Of course, our proposal got shot down.  After all, there was no way that this type of thing would work.  How would you recruit such volunteers?

About a year later, I started talking with some of the team from Galaxy Zoo.    You – the volunteers of Galaxy Zoo-  have made the impossible possible.   With your help, we can create the models we need to understand the histories of hundreds of galaxy collisions.   These models will be more reliable than any a single scientist could create.    This result alone would incredibly important.   However, by carefully analyzing your inputs, we eventually hope to train the computers to do thousands of more models.   This kind of man/machine partnership is being planned for a number of future data projects, where computers need help learning how to be scientists.     We will never discover future Voorwerpen or new Peas without your help.   However, in return, we will also never make you do busy work that a machine can do.

Your efforts on the Zoo projects have created a new the way to do science.     This is nothing less than a transformation in how we look at data, analysis, and computing.

Of course, that’s just a personal perspective.

I just posted a new target for you to try.  We are going to be doing updates at 1600 GMT everyday. even Thanksgiving.  Of course, we will keep the old targets live for a week so you can go and revisit them.   This one is a repeat from some of the beta tests.   Getting a perfect model is hard, but getting close is easy.  We didn’t want to make things too difficult – at least for now.   Be assured, we will be kicking up a notch over the next days and weeks.

-John

Mergers Update

We have just changed the target on the Galaxy Zoo Mergers page (http://mergers.galaxyzoo.org).  The new system has a broken ring and a nearby companion.  It’s a very pretty system, and it seems to be a bit easier to model than the first one we posted.  For all the systems we are putting up as challenges, we do a quick run ourselves to see if we can find any solutions that might be on-track.   Although we found a few solutions right away, we don’t know if they are the best ones or if they are unique.  Of course, that’s why we need your help.

We are going to be updating the target daily.  Every day, we should will have a new cosmic collision for you to help us model.

If you can spend 10 minutes to quickly weed out the obvious bad ones on 20-30 screens, it would be a great help to us!   The more clicks we have, the better we constrain the collision.   Make sure you hit save when you are done looking at the images!  Although we automatically back up some clicks, we don’t want to lose any of your data.

Thanks for all you do.

– John Wallin, Computational Scientist/Astronomer

Galaxy Zoo: Understanding Cosmic Mergers

Starting at midnight 11/24, our new site ‘Galaxy Zoo: Understanding Cosmic Mergers’ went on-line as a new project in Galaxy Zoo. In Mergers, we are working to understand the cosmic collisions that lead to galaxy mergers. Every day we will have a new target galaxy that we need your help to model. Based on the basic input parameters that we provide, a Java applet running in your browser will simulate some possible collision scenarios. Computers don’t do a good job comparing simulations and real astronomical images, so we need your help to find out which simulations are the most similar to the real galaxy collision.

Working on Mergers will require some patience. Some of the collisions we are trying to model are rarer than others, so don’t get discouraged. In some cases, you will need to look at a few hundred images to get your first close match. Just remember, you aren’t looking for perfection. Just try to find a simulation that has some of the unusual and unique tidal features of the target galaxy. When you found something close, you might want to go further and “enhance” the image to make even a better match. The more data we have on these galactic collisions, the more we can narrow down the input parameters that caused these systems to form. You can be the most helpful by looking at a lot of images and then select the best of the best through the evaluate mode of the applet. This will happen automatically when you have selected eight possible merger images.

My graduate student Anthony Holincheck and I have been working on this project for a long time, and are very excited to see it see it launch today. We want to thank all the Zooites that participated in our beta test. Zooites rock! Of course, thanks also go out to Arfon, Chris, Lucy, Nancy, Geza, and Mark in their work in the development. Without all of your help, this project would not be possible. Our team will be adding more features in the coming weeks and months, so please stay tuned.

As I write this blog, we are T-5 hours before the full launch of our site. I cannot help but be humbled by the incredible dedication of the Zooites. With your help, we are going to model the dynamics of hundreds of galaxy collisions. This effort will help us connect the dynamics of galaxy collision to the star formation rates in galaxies. Thank you for your on-going support Galaxy Zoo!

– John Wallin – Computational Scientist/Astronomer

New images in the Zoo

As you may already have heard, Galaxy Zoo has new images in it this week!

You may remember my post in September which described how we’ve added images from SDSS’s ‘Stripe 82’. This is an area of the Sloan survey that has been repeatedly imaged to do things like supernova detection (much like that in Supernova Zoo – you have to look at the same place more than once to see what has changed). A benefit of this is that we can add all these images up to make an image that’s like having a much longer exposure than the ordinary SDSS uses.

Read More…

Get in the queue! – Scaling Galaxy Zoo

Did anyone notice that ‘My Galaxies’ got a little out of date earlier this week?  If you did then you might like to hear a blow-by-blow technical explanation over here.

Cheers

Arfon

Supernova Zoo news

Thanks to all of you who participated in our second trial of the supernova hunt! As with our first trial in August, it was very successful, and kept our WHT observers, Jakob and Isobel, very busy – as you can see from their blogs! In the 3 days that we ran the trial, 2089 of you inspected over 2000 supernova candidates, answering more than 100,000 classification questions. The best of these were then passed to WHT for observation.

The first observing night had relatively poor observing conditions, but the second night was clear and plenty of zoo targets were observed. You can see a selection of the supernovae that you found and that were observed at WHT on the supernova zoo front page. Using the spectrograph on WHT, we were able to confirm these as supernovae and determine their types. We took spectra of more than 20 candidates identified by the zoo, and are now busy reducing and analysing that data.

Our plan now is to take the supernova hunt down for a short while, to make improvements to the tutorial and classification questions. Please do keep the feedback coming – the supernova zoo now has its own sub-forum where you can give us comments, and we will try to answer any questions that you might have. Our goal to have to supernova zoo support all of our Palomar Transient Factory supernova observing runs – and not just those at WHT – in the near future.

Thanks for all of your help!

Mark

Good morning

Almost all candidates on the list have been observed. Some were junk, but most were something real, like a supernova, an AGN, or a star. Now we only have to take some calibration data and burn the data to a dvd. I’m really looking forward to a few hours sleep. Good night!

/Jakob